This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

dyson

The star KIC 8462852 sits 1,480 light years away in the constellation Cygnus. It's an unassuming object at first glance, but it became a hot topic in astronomy last year when data from the planet-hunting Kepler telescope showed something causing fluctuations in the lite coming from KIC 8462852 (nicknamed Tabby's Star, after the astronomer who led the original team). It wasn't a planet, and some speculated that what we were seeing was show of a massive alien megastructure.

As much as scientists accept tried to come up up with a more plausible crusade, Tabby's Star continues to defy explanation. A new report now confirms that in addition to fluctuating, Tabby'southward Star has been getting dimmer overall. It's as if the star is slowly being enveloped.

What originally grabbed the attending of astronomers was the size and elapsing of the dips in light output. Kepler tries to detect new exoplanets via the transit method. It simply watches for modest dips in luminosity when a planet passes in forepart of its host star. These dips are tiny — usually less than a percent and last just a few hours. The first dip detected from KIC 8462852 blocked virtually 1% of its light (similar a large gas giant), but information technology lasted more than a week. That was but the kickoff, though. Kepler detected more than drops in light output from Tabby's Star as large equally 20%, which is huge.

The latest data betoken comes from Caltech astronomer Ben Montet and Joshua Simon from the Carnegie Institute. The pair conducted an exhaustive photometric analysis of the information nerveless by Kepler during its four years of observing KIC 8462852 and other stars in that area of the sky. They found that, yes, the huge dips that astronomers have been puzzling over are there in the original data. More chiefly, its full light output has been dropping over time at a non-linear charge per unit.

light graph

For the first 1000 days of Kepler's observation, Tabby's Star was losing 0.34% brightness annually. In the 200 days following that, it dropped past ii% before leveling off. A total driblet of 3% (in add-on to the transit-like drops of upwards to xx%) is incredibly bizarre. A few months ago, astronomer Bradley Schaefer of Louisiana State University claimed that an exam of sometime photographic plates of Tabby's Star indicated that its brightness had dropped by almost 20% in the last century. Other scientists were skeptical of this claim, but now we have some corroboration that Tabby's Star is indeed getting dimmer overall. Montet and Simon even looked at 500 stars in the vicinity of KIC 8462852 to confirm that none of them were behaving in a like way.

What we have here is a genuine astronomical mystery. Nosotros just don't know what'south going on in orbit of Tabby'due south Star. None of the natural mechanisms scientists have presented can completely explain the data. If this sounds like something out of science fiction, that's because it is. The thought of a massive structure encasing a star has been around for decades — information technology's known as a Dyson Sphere. In fact, astronomical observations very similar to what we run across at KIC 8462852 are described in a number of sci-fi novels (Pandora's Star comes to heed). Maybe this is life imitating fine art.